“Weapons” development as an economic growth strategy 

NM In Focus Interview: https://youtu.be/jZc941TvqWM?t=1909

Nash Jones: When you say aerospace, do you mean weapons?

Uballez: Yeah. Weapons is a possibility. We have the labs here. We have White Sands here. We have a lot of things that we have a specialty in that we could invest in. I mention that because it's a contrast to my dream. We should consider all dreams, right?

Red Flags in Uballez’s Statement

Progressive Democrats and younger voters often raise concerns when candidates frame weapons development as an economic growth strategy because it can clash with their values around peace, demilitarization, and investment in community-based industries. Here’s why this statement could stand out:

Militarization vs. Innovation: Progressives frequently call for public investment in clean energy, healthcare, housing, and education rather than expanding weapons manufacturing. Linking Albuquerque’s economic future to weapons could be seen as prioritizing militarization over social needs.

Ethical Concerns: Many young or progressive voters question whether economic gains tied to weapons production come at the expense of human rights, global security, or peace.

Contrast with Emerging Industries: Albuquerque leaders have been promoting aerospace, renewable energy, film, and quantum technology as growth sectors. Framing “weapons” as a possibility that appears misaligned with progressive visions for sustainable and inclusive development.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.